What makes Barrack Obama so charismatic as compared to Hillary Clinton? Definitely not in looks but rather in their manner of speeches. The crowds are drawn in by the fiery speeches of Obama, who is a Harvard graduate of law studies. Everyone can make speeches, especially politician but to make speeches that makes people sit up, that makes people think about what you are saying, is a great skill. Not many politicians can do that and even in the past presidents of America, only a handful have really mastered that skills. I have not really listened to the old ones but the great one like the late Reagan is one fine example of a great orator. I think the next one is Barrack obama and I think he will make a fine President for America. He can captivate the audience with hope. He has great attitude and is matured in his handling of the masses. A great leader is a great actor and a great debater. I think Obama has all these qualities.
leadership in small business
Leadership in small business is important. A good leader must be able to communicate well with the customers, suppliers and even more importantly, his subordinates in the company. He should lead by example and a team player. As a team leader, he should be skillful in making good decisions, especially in finance decisions. Making sure that the business is not only performing well but financially sound is also the responsibility of the leader. Many would have thought that this is the job of the accountant.Not really, the accountant can assist and advise only.The final decision and policy is still with the leader. So make sure, you have plan and put in place, systems for ensuring that your company is financially sound and that you have plenty of cash to ensure that your company is liquid.
Leadership types
The new leadership differs from traditional leadership primarily in that it emphasises vision and change and focuses on attribution, charisma, transformation and related concepts.
Attribution leadership theory overlaps these two approaches, though it can be placed more on the new leadership side of such a model.
Great human/trait and leadership behaviour, the first of the traditional leadership approaches, argues that leader traits or behaviours have a major impact on leadership outcomes. Traits are considered more innate and harder to change than are behaviours. They are often the basis of selection for people in leadership positions. Leader behaviours have been the basis of several studies including the
Traits and behaviours are also often used in situational contingency approaches, summarised below, or even new leadership approaches. The leader situational contingency thrust argues that leadership, in combination with various situational variables, has a major impact on outcomes. Sometimes, as in the case of the substitutes for leadership perspective, the role of the situational variables replaces that of leadership to the point that leadership has little or no impact in itself. Fiedler’s contingency theory, House’s path-goal theory, and Hersey and Blanchard’s situational leadership theory, in addition to the substitutes for leadership approach, are perspectives that consider the impact not just of leadership but of various situational contingencies.
These theories tend to assume that leadership and its substantive effects can be easily identified and measured, but this is not always the case. Attribution theory overlaps traditional and new leadership by emphasising the importance of the symbolic aspects of leadership. These aspects are an especially important part of the new leadership, charismatic, transformational and related orientations, according to which followers tend to attribute heroic or extraordinary leadership abilities to a leader when they observe certain behaviours from that leader. These attributions can then help transform followers to achieve goals that go beyond their own self-interest and, in turn, help transform the organisation.
